Archives for: 2009, week 49

12/08/09

Permalink 02:46:42 pm, by jaguar1024 Email , 680 words   English (US)
Categories: News

DNA Evidence is the BEST Proof, or is it??

O.J. Simpson. The DNA said he was guilty but then his money, fame and the infamous 'Chewbacca Defense' got him off. That's what white America says anyhow, well that and some of black America and most of light brown and yellow America as well. Case closed.

It makes NO SENSE!


Or was it?? Now according to the defense in the O.J. case the Los Angeles Police lost somewhere between ten millimeters and thirteen milliliters of the blood that O.J. gave in a sample to be tested against blood stains at Nicole Simpson's house, the crime scene. This was confirmed by the L.A. Crime Lab and further it was proved that only a few of the blood stains that 'proved' O.J. Simpson guilty were larger than half a milliliter, or 500 picoliters. That small of a sample was ample for a PCR DNA test and match, so say DNA experts in America. Keep that in mind as you read on.

If I dood it, I get a whuppin.............


Or is it?? Now, you may have heard about the Amanda Knox trial over in Italy, you know that country shaped like a boot that dangles out of Europe's groin. I'll recap, attractive girl A.)

Meredith Kerchner, no joke here.


Is brutally butchered by Some Italian black guy and/or Amanda Knox and her Italian douche bag boyfriend B.)

No, they don't look guilty at all.........

They rape, torture and murder her, allegedly. Now I have a few problems with this case and no it's not going to be a shrill guilty or not guilty diatribe. I wasn't there, I don't know who killed whom or why or who was in the bathroom with the mud-butt from a bad kebab (hint, it wasn't the Italian douche bag)I wasn't there, I have no opinion on who is actually guilty or not guilty. What I am concerned with is the American Reaction to the whole case.

Here in America, attractive , white teenage girl=incapable of committing a crime. Which is where Amanda Knox fits in.

I'm too cute to be a killer, tee-hee!

So of course the Attorney General of Amanda's home state calls the trial and prosecution a sham and a mockery (a shamockery!) of justice, and her family calls 'DNA foul' and even Hillary Clinton is getting involved as poor Amanda Knox has been found guilty along with her alleged co-conspirators. Whatever, the jury has decided, I'm done with matter. However Amanda Knox's family and supporters aren't done with the matter.

Our money says our daughter is innocent.

Or are they?? No, they aren't. Here is their contention: the DNA evidence found on the apparent murder weapon that links the knife via blood DNA on the blade to Meredith Kerchner (the victim) and on the handle to Amanda Knox (the adorable defendant) is too small a sample to have yielded a DNA result. Oh and this knife was found at Italian douche bag boyfriends house. Case closed, too small a sample for DNA, right? WRONG!

How big was the sample you may ask? Well it was 500 picoliters. So we arrive at my point. 500 picoliters of blood is a large enough, reliable enough sample to charge a black man with murder, and would have been enough to convict if not for his money. YET it is total scandal that Italian police would use it as evidence against a white, moderately attractive piece of jail-bait like Amanda Knox.

I plead Not Guilty by reason of hotness, your honor.

For fucks sake America, can we at least try to be a little less hypocritical at least part of the time? If DNA is air tight enough to convict people over here in America then how about we let the Italian Police have the same credibility? Any one who says that evidence is a sham or isn't compelling enough needs to take a good hard look at the DNA evidence used here in the U.S. to send people to death row every single day.

Is Amanda Knox guilty? Fuck if I know, I wasn't there so the best that any of us can do is to let the Italian justice system do it's job and let a jury of her peers decide her fate. Which they did, and they said she is guilty and that is good enough for me.

12/07/09

Permalink 10:51:48 am, by jaguar1024 Email , 435 words   English (US)
Categories: Welcome

Change You Can Believe In, Believe it!

I can't help to come back to this point, so I will state it again. The Soviet Union with two hundred and fifty thousand troops, troops I might add unburdened by having to win hearts and minds or build a democracy, could not subdue Afghanistan. So now President Obama thinks we can do it with another thirty to thirty two thousand G.I.'s.

Anything Bush can do, I can do better!

For fucks sake Mister President. So our troop level in Afhcrapistan is going to balloon from sixty-eight thousand to about one-hundred thousand. Again, I hope you see what I'm getting at here. We are supposed to secure, hold, and win the hearts of minds of a country about the size of Texas with twelve million inhabitants with only about one-hundred thousand troops, maybe as many as one-hundred and fifty thousand if our allies send anyone, anyone at all. Which they won't, except for the UK which shares our enthusiasm for lost causes.

Now, I'm no big city Four Star General, but in reading COIN (counter insurgency) pamphlets, manuals and of course General Rupert Smith's 'Utility of Force' President Obama and his military advisor's are complete assholes.

That IS funny.......wait, asshole? Michelle stop clapping.

Why would I say a thing like that? Well, because they are. General Stanley McChrystal, the man who we now want to 'win hearts and minds' headed a black OPs hit team that roamed AfPak looking for mullahs to kill, oh and he knows shit all about COIN operations, except for what General Petraeus tells him. So we have The Emperor and Darth Vader convincing President Obama that we need to send just enough troops to Afghanistan to get more American troops killed. Which, is well, not a winning strategy. It is a strategy to cover everyones asses and keep the war in Afghanistan going just long enough for Obama to tell Republicans and American voters that he is 'tough' on terrorism.

I need You! To be cannon fodder.........


Of course we are still forgetting that Obama isn't bringing troops home from Iraq so he is basically going to have to deploy troops from Iraq to Afghanistan......goodbye Christmas leave! During the election campaign Obama sure made it sound like he'd end the war in Iraq and act more responsibly in Afghanistan, instead he's just doing what Bush did, and somehow he expects different results.

So, there is the 'Change you can believe in'. I believe it, I believed it before the election that change wouldn't come, and it hasn't and it's because President Obama is too chicken shit to see reality and do the right things for our troops and our nation.

Chicks, man.

Voted for Obama because you hated Bush did you?

2009
 << Current>>
Jan Feb Mar Apr
May Jun Jul Aug
Sep Oct Nov Dec

This is a blogs. A blogs is an online journal. I will fill this blogs with stuffs from inside my head. This blogs will be updated sometimes and sometimes it won't. This Blogs is written by Jaguar1024 the same guy that broughts you www.jagassery.com

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

Search

XML Feeds

Intensedebate

free open source blog